Journal of Political Economy Vol. 114 No. 3 2006
How Basic Are Behavioral Biases? Evidence from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior
Abstract
Behavioral economics has demonstrated systematic decision‐making biases in both lab and field data. Do these biases extend across contexts, cultures, or even species? We investigate this question by introducing fiat currency and trade to a colony of capuchin monkeys and recovering their preferences over a range of goods and gambles. We show that capuchins react rationally to both price and wealth shocks but display several hallmark biases when faced with gambles, including reference dependence and loss aversion. Given our capuchins’ inexperience with money and trade, these results suggest that loss aversion extends beyond humans and may be innate rather than learned.
- DOI
- 10.1086/503550
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 517-537
- Language
- en
- Sources
- bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref