← Search

Review of Accounting Studies Vol. 29 No. 1 2024

The asymmetric mispricing information in analysts’ target prices

Jeremiah Green1; John R. M. Hand2,3; Anywhere Sikochi4

1 Texas A&M University · 2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · 3 University of North Carolina Health Care · 4 Harvard University Press

open access

Abstract

We study the mispricing information present in the target prices of US and international analysts. We hypothesize that asymmetry in the value-relevance of the information that managers supply to analysts, combined with asymmetry in the incentives facing analysts to curry favor with managers, leads to analyst-claimed undervaluation being more predictive of future stock returns than analyst-claimed overvaluation. Our empirical tests isolate analyst-claimed mispricing by first removing analysts’ estimates of the cost of equity from the returns implied by target prices and then separating analyst-claimed undervaluation from overvaluation. We find that target prices only predict future returns (at 16 cents to 18 cents on the dollar) when analysts claim undervaluation, not when they claim overvaluation. We also observe that analyst-claimed undervaluation predicts future returns more strongly after firms experience low returns and when macro-driven valuation uncertainty is low.

DOI
10.1007/s11142-022-09730-z
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
889-915
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib

Cite