← Search

Review of Finance Vol. 12 No. 1 2008

One Share - One Vote: the Theory

Mike Burkart1; Samuel Lee2

1 1 Stockholm School of Economics, London School of Economics, CEPR and ECGI · 2 2 Stockholm School of Economics and SITE

open access

Abstract

The theoretical literature on security-voting structure can be organized around three questions: What impact do nonvoting shares have on takeover outcomes? How does disproportional voting power affect the incentives of blockholders? What are the repercussions of mandating one share - one vote for firms' financing and ownership choices? Overall, the costs and benefits of separating cash flow and votes reflect the fundamental governance trade off between disempowering blockholders and empowering managers. It is therefore an open question whether mandating one share - one vote would improve the quality of corporate governance, notably in systems that so far relied on active owners.

DOI
10.1093/rof/rfm035
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-49
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite