← Search

Review of Finance Vol. 25 No. 2 2021

The Persistence of Fee Dispersion among Mutual Funds

Michael J. Cooper1; Michael Halling2,3; Wenhao Yang4

1 University of Utah · 2 Stockholm School of Economics · 3 Swedish House of Finance · 4 School of Management and Economics and Shenzhen Finance Institute, Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shenzhen

open access

Abstract

Previous work shows large differences in fees for S&P 500 index funds and other funds and suggests that investors suffer wealth losses investing in high-fee funds when similar low-fee funds are available. In contrast, the neoclassical model of mutual funds (Berk and van Binsbergen, 2015, J. Financ. Econ., 118, 1–20) argues that percentage fees are irrelevant, as fund size will adjust in equilibrium such that net alphas are equal to zero. We show that fees matter from an investor perspective. We document (i) a strong negative association between net-of-fee fund performance and fees in a sample of all US and international equity funds, (ii) economically large, robust, persistent, and pervasive fee dispersion in the mutual fund industry, and (iii) important economic effects for investors. During the sample period, the mutual fund industry has generated a total value lost (i.e., a negative net value added) of 125 billion USD, coming predominantly from high-fee funds.

DOI
10.1093/rof/rfaa023
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
365-402
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite