← Search

Review of Finance Vol. 29 No. 3 2025

Executive compensation with environmental and social performance

Pierre Chaigneau1; Nicolas Sahuguet2

1 Smith School of Business, Queen’s University , Kingston, K7L 2P3, · 2 Applied Economics Department, HEC Montréal , Montréal, H3T 2A7,

open access

Abstract

How can managers be incentivized to create both financial and social value? Since managers can anticipate how their decisions impact social performance metrics, they may game a compensation scheme based on these measures. Nevertheless, the optimal compensation contract still incorporates social performance metrics when the board’s preferred level of social investment exceeds the level that maximizes the stock price. In this case, gaming distorts social investments, and the sensitivity of pay to social performance is reduced to mitigate this effect. When multiple independent social performance measures are available, the inefficiencies caused by gaming can be alleviated. Our findings suggest that efforts to harmonize social performance measurement may have unintended negative consequences.

DOI
10.1093/rof/rfaf012
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
779-818
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite