← Search

Strategic Management Journal Vol. 35 No. 9 2014

Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices

Brian Wu1; Zhixi Wan2; Daniel A. Levinthal3

1 Stephen M. Ross School of Business University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan U.S.A. · 2 College of Business University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Champaign Illinois U.S.A. · 3 Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania U.S.A.

open access

Abstract

The issue of the failure of incumbent firms in the face of radical technical change has been a central question in the technology strategy domain for some time. We add to prior contributions by highlighting the role a firm's existing set of complementary assets have in influencing its investment in alternative technological trajectories. We develop an analytical model that considers firm heterogeneity with respect to both technological trajectories and complementary assets. Complementary assets play a dual role in incumbents' investment behavior toward radical technological change: they are not only resources (pipes) that can buffer firms from technology change, but also prisms through which firms view those changes, influencing both the magnitude of resources that should be invested and the trajectory to which these resources should be directed .

DOI
10.1002/smj.2159
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1257-1278
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite