← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 91 No. 4 2016

The Interactive Role of Difficulty and Incentives in Explaining the Annual Earnings Forecast Walkdown

Mark T. Bradshaw1; Lian Fen Lee1; Kyle Peterson2

1 Boston College · 2 University of Oregon

Abstract

The within-year walkdown of analysts' earnings forecasts has largely been attributed to analysts' incentives to curry favor with managers. We appeal to cognitive psychology literature on motivated reasoning and propose that forecasting difficulty interacts with such incentives to yield the observed walkdown. Higher forecasting difficulty generates a wider range of outcomes from which analysts can justify optimistically biased forecasts. In regression analyses, we find that the interaction between analysts' incentives for optimism and difficulty exhibits the strongest effect on earnings walkdowns. We also examine revenue forecasts as a benchmark of lower forecasting difficulty and find that revenue walkdowns are relatively diminutive. However, when analysts forecast losses, revenue forecasts are more critical and exhibit markedly steeper walkdowns. Our results suggest that analyst forecast walkdowns are better characterized by an interactive effect between analysts' strategic incentives for optimism and forecasting difficulty. JEL Classifications: G17; M41. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources identified in the text.

DOI
10.2308/accr-51398
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
995-1021
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite