← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 94 No. 4 2019

The Value Relevance of Managers' and Auditors' Disclosures About Material Measurement Uncertainty

Sean A. Dennis1; Jeremy B. Griffin2; Karla M. Johnstone3

1 University of Central Florida · 2 The University of Mississippi · 3 University of Wisconsin–Madison

Abstract

Regulators now require auditors to provide information about how they evaluate complex estimates. Because users encounter this auditor-provided information alongside management-provided information, we jointly examine the value relevance of these disclosures. We also examine whether visual cues in audit reports influence how nonprofessional investors use these disclosures. We find that disclosures from managers and auditors provide different value-relevant information about the same underlying issue. While users struggle to weight fully narrative auditor disclosures in their valuation judgments without corresponding management disclosures, visual cues facilitate their weighting of information about the audit. Specifically, users take increased price protection when auditor disclosures also include visual cues. However, consistent with market signaling theory, corresponding voluntary disclosures from management attenuate this price protection. This suggests management can mitigate negative valuation effects that may arise from auditor disclosures, and implies that visual cues in audit reports can prompt managers to increase disclosure transparency. Data Availability: Contact the authors.

DOI
10.2308/accr-52272
Volume
94
Issue
4
Pages
215-243
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite