← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 98 No. 1 2023

Regulator Continuity and Decision-Making Quality: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters

Matthew Kubic; Sara Toynbee

The University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Staff at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) conduct recurring reviews of firms’ filings to deter misconduct and facilitate investor access to high-quality information. We identify the names of SEC staff who work on a comment letter and examine whether their prior involvement (i.e., continuity) is associated with comment letter quality. Our results are consistent with continuity leading to lower-quality comment letters. Continuity is associated with fewer substantive comments, agreed-upon disclosure changes, and greater similarity between consecutive comment letter reviews. These results are consistent with continuity increasing staffs’ tendency to focus on familiar issues and overlook other areas of potential deficiencies. Time, changes in firms’ operations, and increasing staffs’ feelings of accountability can mitigate the negative effect of continuity on comment letter quality. Our study suggests benefits to a fresh perspective in regulatory monitoring.

DOI
10.2308/tar-2021-0432
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
365-398
Language
en
Sources
crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex

Cite