← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 97 No. 6 2022

Theory Testing and Process Evidence in Accounting Experiments

H. Scott Asay1; Ryan Guggenmos2; Kathryn Kadous3; Lisa Koonce4; Robert Libby2

1 The University of Iowa · 2 Cornell University · 3 Emory University · 4 The University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of process evidence in accounting research. We define process evidence broadly as data providing insight into how and why cause-effect relationships occur, and we provide a framework to guide the provision and evaluation of process evidence in accounting studies. Our definition allows for an expanded understanding of techniques for gathering process evidence. The framework highlights the importance of the study's goals and theory in choosing how to provide process evidence, as well as how much process evidence to provide. The paper also outlines the strengths and limitations of three approaches to providing process evidence: mediation, moderation, and multiple-study-based designs. We provide recommendations for best practices for each approach to minimize threats to validity and maximize the value of process evidence.

DOI
10.2308/tar-2019-1001
Volume
97
Issue
6
Pages
23-43
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite