← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 99 No. 6 2024

Classifying Forecasts

Michael S. Drake1; James Moon2; J. Donald Warren3

1 Brigham Young University · 2 Georgia Institute of Technology · 3 Texas A&M University

Abstract

We employ a novel machine learning technique to classify analysts’ forecast revisions into five types based on how the revision weighs publicly available signals. We label these forecast types as quant, sundry, contrarian, herder, and independent forecasts. Our tests reveal that a greater diversity of forecast types within the consensus is associated with increased consensus dispersion and improved consensus accuracy. Additionally, consensus diversity is associated with an improved information environment for firms, as reflected in reduced earnings announcement information asymmetry and volatility, higher earnings response coefficients, and faster price formation. Our study sheds light on how analysts revise their forecasts and documents capital market benefits associated with different analyst forecasting approaches.

DOI
10.2308/tar-2023-0117
Volume
99
Issue
6
Pages
129-156
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite