← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 96 No. 4 2021

Blame Attribution and Disclosure Propensity

Jason D. Schloetzer1; Ayung Tseng2; Teri Lombardi Yohn3; Yeo Sang Yoon4

1 Georgetown University · 2 Indiana University · 3 Emory University · 4 University of Minnesota

Abstract

We find that firms are less likely to disclose information regarding a negative economic event for which the firm is likely to be blamed than a negative event for which the firm is likely to be perceived as blameless. We identify 383 material negative events (casualty accidents, oil spills, catastrophes, investor class action lawsuits) and find that firms are approximately four times less likely to disclose information following a negative blamed event than a blameless event. Consistent with disclosure of blamed events resulting in greater costs to the firm, we find that firms that disclose after a blamed, but not a blameless, event experience greater reputation and litigation costs than firms that do not disclose. We find that blame attribution provides incremental information over manager career concerns in the disclosure decision. These findings suggest that an event-specific factor—blame attribution—affects firms' propensity to provide disclosures about negative economic events. Data Availability: The list of 383 material negative economic events is available upon request.

DOI
10.2308/tar-2018-0397
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
405-432
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite