← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 86 No. 1 2011

Do Investors Understand Really Dirty Surplus?

Wayne R. Landsman1; Bruce L. Miller2; Ken V. Peasnell3; Shu Yeh4

1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · 2 University of California, Los Angeles · 3 Lancaster University · 4 National Taiwan University

Abstract

This study addresses whether firms’ share prices correctly reflect two accounting measures: dirty surplus and really dirty surplus. Dirty surplus is readily observable from the financial statements, but really dirty surplus, which arises from recognizing equity transactions such as employee stock option exercises at other than fair market value, is not. Findings show that dirty surplus and really dirty surplus are irrelevant for forecasting abnormal comprehensive income. However, findings also indicate that investors appear to undervalue really dirty surplus. Hedge returns are insignificant when portfolios are formed based on dirty surplus, but are significantly positive based on really dirty surplus. Really dirty surplus positive hedge returns are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests. Taken together, the findings are consistent with either investors over-valuing firms that have large negative really dirty surplus or really dirty surplus being correlated with an unmodeled risk factor.

DOI
10.2308/accr.00000014
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
237-258
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite