← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 113 No. 8 2023

Who Benefits from State Corporate Tax Cuts? A Local Labor Markets Approach with Heterogeneous Firms: Comment

Clément Malgouyres1; Thierry Mayer2; Clément Mazet-Sonilhac3

1 CNRS-CREST and IPP-PSE (email: ) · 2 Sciences Po, CEPII, and CEPR (email: ) · 3 Bocconi University, Department of Finance (email: )

open access

Abstract

Suárez Serrato and Zidar (2016) identify state corporate tax incidence in a spatial equilibrium model with imperfectly mobile firms. Their identification argument rests on comparative statics omitting a channel implied by their model: the link between common determinants of a location’s attractiveness and the average idiosyncratic productivity of firms choosing that location. This compositional margin causes the labor demand elasticity to be independent from the product demand elasticity, impeding the identification of incidence from the four estimated reduced-form effects. Assigning consensual values to the unidentified parameters, we find that the incidence share borne by firm owners is closer to 25 percent than 40 percent.

DOI
10.1257/aer.20201753
Volume
113
Issue
8
Pages
2270-2286
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite