← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 114 No. 2 2024

Gender Differences in Medical Evaluations: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Doctors

Marika Cabral1; Marcus Dillender2

1 University of Texas at Austin Department of Economics and NBER, (email: ) · 2 Vanderbilt University and NBER (email: )

Abstract

Little is known about what drives gender disparities in health care and related social insurance benefits. Using data and variation from the Texas workers’ compensation program, we study the impact of gender match between doctors and patients on medical evaluations and associated disability benefits. Compared to differences among their male patient counterparts, female patients randomly assigned a female doctor rather than a male doctor are 5.2 percent more likely to be evaluated as disabled and receive 8.6 percent more subsequent cash benefits on average. There is no analogous gender-match effect for male patients. Our estimates indicate that increasing the share of female patients evaluated by female doctors may substantially shrink gender gaps in medical evaluations and associated outcomes.

DOI
10.1257/aer.20220349
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
462-499
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite