← Search

Journal of Finance Vol. 74 No. 2 2019

Who Finances Durable Goods and Why It Matters: Captive Finance and the Coase Conjecture

Justin Murfin1; Ryan Pratt2,3

1 Yale University · 2 Cornell University · 3 Thales (Australia)

Abstract

We propose that, by financing their own product sales through captive finance subsidiaries, durable goods manufacturers commit to higher resale values for their products in future periods. Using data on captive financing by the manufacturers of heavy equipment, we find that captive‐backed models have lower price depreciation. The evidence is consistent with captive finance helping manufacturers commit to ex‐post actions that support used machine prices. This, in turn, conveys higher pledgeability for captive‐backed products, even for individual machines financed by banks. Although motivated as a rent‐seeking device, captive financing generates positive spillovers by relaxing credit constraints.

DOI
10.1111/jofi.12745
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
755-793
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref openalex

Cite