Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 124 No. 1 2009
Learning and Visceral Temptation in Dynamic Saving Experiments*
Abstract
This paper tests two explanations for apparent undersaving in life cycle models: bounded rationality and a preference for immediacy. Each was addressed in a separate experimental study. In the first study, subjects saved too little initially—providing evidence for bounded rationality—but learned to save optimally within four repeated life cycles. In the second study, thirsty subjects who consume beverage sips immediately, rather than with a delay, show greater relative overspending, consistent with quasi-hyperbolic discounting models. The parameter estimates of overspending obtained from the second study, but not the first, are in range of several empirical studies of saving (with an estimated β = 0.6–0.7).
- DOI
- 10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.197
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-231
- Language
- en
- Sources
- bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref