← Search

Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 139 No. 1 2024

A Denial a Day Keeps the Doctor Away

Abe Dunn1; Joshua D. Gottlieb2; Adam Hale Shapiro3; Daniel J Sonnenstuhl4; Pietro Tebaldi5

1 Bureau of Economic Analysis , United States · 2 University of Chicago and National Bureau of Economic Research , United States · 3 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco , United States · 4 University of Chicago , United States · 5 Columbia University and National Bureau of Economic Research, United States

open access

Abstract

Who bears the consequences of administrative problems in health care? We use data on repeated interactions between a large sample of U.S. physicians and many different insurers to document the complexity of health care billing, and estimate its economic costs for doctors and consequences for patients. Observing the back-and-forth sequences of claim denials and resubmissions for past visits, we can estimate physicians’ costs of haggling with insurers to collect payments. Combining these costs with the revenue never collected, we estimate that physicians lose 18% of Medicaid revenue to billing problems, compared with 4.7% for Medicare and 2.4% for commercial insurers. Identifying off of physician movers and practices that span state boundaries, we find that physicians respond to billing problems by refusing to accept Medicaid patients in states with more severe billing hurdles. These hurdles are quantitatively just as important as payment rates for explaining variation in physicians’ willingness to treat Medicaid patients. We conclude that administrative frictions have first-order costs for doctors, patients, and equality of access to health care. We quantify the potential economic gains—in terms of reduced public spending or increased access to physicians—if these frictions could be reduced and find them to be sizable.

DOI
10.1093/qje/qjad035
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
187-233
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite