← Search

Review of Economic Studies Vol. 68 No. 3 2001

Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation

Philippe Aghion1,2,3; Christopher Harris4; Peter Howitt5; John Vickers6

1 Center for Economic and Policy Research · 2 Harvard University · 3 University College London · 4 The King's College · 5 John Brown University · 6 All Souls College, Oxford

open access

Abstract

Is more intense product market competition and imitation good or bad for growth? This question is addressed in the context of an endogenous growth model with “step-by-step” innovations, in which technological laggards must first catch up with the leading-edge technology before battling for technological leadership in the future. In contrast to earlier Schumpeterian models in which innovations are always made by outsider firms who earn no rents if they fail to innovate and become monopolies if they do innovate, here we find: first, that the usual Schumpeterian effect of more intense product market competition (PMC) is almost always outweighed by the increased incentive for firms to innovate in order to escape competition, so that PMC has a positive effect on growth; second, that a little imitation is almost always growth-enhancing, as it promotes more frequent neck-and-neck competition, but too much imitation is unambiguously growth-reducing. The model thus points to complementary roles for competition (anti-trust) policy and patent policy.

DOI
10.1111/1467-937x.00177
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
467-492
Language
en
Sources
crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex

Cite