← Search

Review of Financial Studies Vol. 31 No. 8 2018

Vote Avoidance and Shareholder Voting in Mergers and Acquisitions

Kai Li1; Tingting Liu2; Juan Wu3

1 Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia · 2 Heider College of Business, Creighton University · 3 College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Abstract

We examine whether, how, and why acquirer shareholder voting matters. We show that acquirers with low institutional ownership, high deal risk, and high agency costs are more likely to bypass shareholder voting. Such acquirers have lower announcement returns and make higher offers than those who do not. To avoid a shareholder vote, acquirers increase equity issuance and cut payouts to raise the portion of cash in mixed-payment deals. Employing a regression discontinuity design, we show a positive effect on acquirer announcement returns concentrated in acquirers with higher institutional ownership. We conclude that shareholder voting mitigates agency problems in corporate acquisitions. Received April 18, 2017; editorial decision February 9, 2018 by Editor David Denis.

DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhy065
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
3176-3211
Language
en
Sources
crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex

Cite