← Search

Review of Financial Studies Vol. 35 No. 4 2022

Activism and Takeovers

Mike Burkart1; Samuel Lee2

1 London School of Economics and Political Science, Swedish House of Finance, CEPR, and ECGI · 2 Santa Clara University, ECGI, and Swedish House of Finance

open access

Abstract

We compare activism and takeovers from the perspective of a blockholder who can provide effort to improve firm value. We show that free-riding behavior by dispersed shareholders has the following implications: First, activism can be more profitable than a hostile takeover even if it is less efficient. Second, activism is most efficient when it brokers, rather than substitutes for, takeovers. Third, such takeover activism earns superior returns. More broadly, our theory implies that activists specialize in governance reforms with limited, temporary ownership being a strength rather than a shortcoming of activism.

DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhab039
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1868-1896
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite