← Search

Review of Financial Studies Vol. 35 No. 1 2021

Reconsidering Returns

Samuel M. Hartzmark1; David H. Solomon2

1 Booth School of Business, University of Chicago and NBER · 2 Carroll School of Management, Boston College

Abstract

Investors’ perception of performance is biased because the relevant measure, returns, is rarely displayed. Major indices ignore dividends, thereby underreporting market performance. Newspapers are more pessimistic on ex-dividend days, consistent with mistaking the index for returns. Market betas should track returns, but track prices more than dividends, creating predictable returns. Mutual funds receive inflows for “beating the S&P 500” price index based on net asset value (also not a return). Investors extrapolate market indices, not returns, when forming annual performance expectations. Displaying returns by default would ameliorate these issues, which arise despite high attention and agreement on the appropriate measure.

DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhab015
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
343-393
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite