← Search

Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 25 No. 1 2008

Audit Pricing, Legal Liability Regimes, and Big 4 Premiums: Theory and Cross‐country Evidence*

Jong‐Hag Choi1,2,3,4; Jeong‐Bon Kim5,6; Xiaohong Liu7,8; Dan A. Simunic9

1 Seoul National University · 2 New Generation University College · 3 National University College · 4 College of Business Administration · 5 Hong Kong Polytechnic University · 6 University of Hong Kong · 7 City University of Hong Kong · 8 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · 9 University of British Columbia

Abstract

In this paper, we first develop a model in which national legal environments play a crucial role in determining auditor effort and audit fees. Our model predicts that: (1) audit fees increase monotonically with the strength or strictness of a country’s legal liability regime; (2) given a legal liability regime, Big 4 auditors charge higher audit fees than non-Big 4 auditors; and (3) the Big 4 fee premium decreases as a country’s legal regime shifts from a weak to a strong regime. We then test the model’s predictions using a large sample of audit clients from 15 countries with different legal regimes where audit fee data are publicly available. The results of our cross-country regressions strongly support the above three predictions, and are robust to a variety of sensitivity checks. Furthermore, we find that the effects of a legal regime on audit pricing and the Big 4 premium are more salient for the small client segment than for the large client segment. Overall, our regression results indicate that a country’s legal environment plays an important role in determining both audit fees and the fee spread between Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors.

DOI
10.1506/car.25.1.2
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
55-99
Language
en
Sources
crossref openalex

Cite