← Search

Review of Financial Studies Vol. 22 No. 10 2009

Conflicts of Interest and Stock Recommendations: The Effects of the Global Settlement and Related Regulations

Ohad Kadan1; Leonardo Madureira2; Rong Wang3; Tzachi Zach4,5

1 Washington University in St. Louis · 2 Case Western Reserve University · 3 Singapore Management University · 4 Fisher College · 5 The Ohio State University

Abstract

We study the effect of the Global Analyst Research Settlement and related regulations on sell-side research. These regulations attempted to mitigate the interdependence between research and investment banking. We document that following the regulations many brokerage houses have migrated from the traditional five-tier rating system to a three-tier system. Optimistic recommendations have become less frequent and more informative, whereas neutral and pessimistic recommendations have become more frequent and less informative. Importantly, the overall informativeness of recommendations has declined. The likelihood of issuing optimistic recommendations no longer depends on affiliation with the covered firm, although affiliated analysts are still reluctant to issue pessimistic recommendations. The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected], Oxford University Press.

DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhn109
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
4189-4217
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref

Cite