← Search

Do Director Elections Matter?

Vyacheslav Fos1; Kai Li2; Margarita Tsoutsoura3

1 Carroll School of Management, Boston College · 2 Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia · 3 Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University

Review of Financial Studies 2018

Using a hand-collected sample of election nominations for more than 30, 000 directors over the period 2001–2010, we construct a novel measure of director proximity to elections called Years-to-election. We find that the closer directors of a board are to their next elections, the higher CEO turnover-performance sensitivity is. A series of tests, including one that exploits variation in Years-to-election that comes from other boards, supports a causal interpretation. Further analyses show that other governance mechanisms do not drive the relation between board Years-to-election and CEO turnover-performance sensitivity. We conclude that director elections have important implications for corporate governance. Received March 10, 2016; editorial decision May 19, 2017 by Editor Itay Goldstein.

DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhx078
Volume
31 (4)
Pages
1499-1531
Language
en
Export
BibTeX
Sources
openalex crossref