← Search

Tunnel-Proofing the Executive Suite: Transparency, Temptation, and the Design of Executive Compensation

Thomas H. Noe1,2

1 Tulane University · 2 University of Oxford

Review of Financial Studies 2009

This paper considers optimal compensation for a CEO who is entrusted with administering corporate assets honestly. Optimal compensation designs maximize integrity at minimum cost. These designs are very “low powered,” i.e., while specifying a lower bound for performance and increasing pay with performance, they increase compensation at a rapidly decreasing rate. Thus, integrity considerations engender optimal compensation packages that closely resemble the very pervasive 80/120 bonus plans, exactly the sort of compensation that Jensen (2003) argues should compromise integrity. Under optimal designs, expected compensation increases linearly with firm size, and increases in the market/book ratio. Moreover, given optimal compensation, CEO asset diversion is limited to high market-to-book firms that have received negative productivity shocks.

DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhp002
Volume
22 (12)
Pages
4849-4880
Language
en
Export
BibTeX
Sources
openalex crossref