← Search

The Accounting Review Vol. 60 No. 4 1985

Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Selection Techniques and Firm Performance

Susan F. Haka1; Lawrence A. Gordon2; George E. Pinches3

1 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Michigan State University. 1 · 2 Ernst & Whinney Alumni Professor of Accounting, University of Maryland. 2 · 3 Professor of Business, University of Kansas. 3

Abstract

Firms using sophisticated capital budgeting techniques (i.e., those that employ present value analysis and account for risk) should theoretically perform better than firms using naive models such as the payback period or accounting rate of return. However, previous empirical work examining this question has produced mixed results. To correct for limitations in these studies, several tests were conducted on firms that adopted sophisticated selection techniques versus a control group of firms that employed naive techniques. After controlling for differences in systematic risk, industry effects, and size, interrupted time-series tests of relative market returns were performed. Based on the results of this study we conclude that the adoption of sophisticated capital budgeting selection techniques will not, per se, result in superior firm performance. It is possible that the adoption of sophisticated selection techniques is one of many policies the firm pursues in the face of economic stress, and this, in combination with other policies, may help to bring about economic recovery for the firm.

DOI
10.2308/tar-4491668
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
651-669
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref

Cite