← Search

Review of Accounting Studies Vol. 24 No. 1 2019

Quality minus junk

Clifford S. Asness1; Andrea Frazzini1,2; Lasse Heje Pedersen3,4

1 AQR Capital Management, Two Greenwich Plaza, Greenwich, CT 06830, USA · 2 NYU, New York, NY, USA · 3 Copenhagen Business School · 4 Centre for Economic Policy Research

open access

Abstract

We define quality as characteristics that investors should be willing to pay a higher price for. Theoretically, we provide a tractable valuation model that shows how stock prices should increase in their quality characteristics: profitability, growth, and safety. Empirically, we find that high-quality stocks do have higher prices on average but not by a large margin. Perhaps because of this puzzlingly modest impact of quality on price, high-quality stocks have high risk-adjusted returns. Indeed, a quality-minus-junk (QMJ) factor that goes long high-quality stocks and shorts low-quality stocks earns significant risk-adjusted returns in the United States and across 24 countries. The price of quality varies over time, reaching a low during the internet bubble, and a low price of quality predicts a high future return of QMJ. Analysts’ price targets and earnings forecasts imply systematic quality-related errors in return and earnings expectations.

DOI
10.1007/s11142-018-9470-2
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
34-112
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref

Cite