← Search

Pareto Improvements in the Contest for College Admissions

Kala Krishna^1,2; Sergey Lychagin³; Wojciech Olszewski⁴; Ron Siegel¹; Chloe Tergiman⁵

¹ Department of Economics, The Pennsylvania State University , · ² NBER · ³ WIFO Institute , · ⁴ Department of Economics, Northwestern University · ⁵ Smeal College of Business, the Pennsylvania State University

Abstract Many countries base college admissions on a centrally administered test. Students invest a great deal of resources to improve their performance on the test, and there is growing concern about the high costs associated with these activities. We consider modifying the test by introducing performance-disclosure policies that pool intervals of performance rankings. Pooling affects the equilibrium allocation of students to colleges, which hurts some students and benefits others, but also affects students’ effort. We investigate how such policies can improve students’ welfare in a Pareto sense, study the Pareto frontier of pooling policies, and identify improvements that are robust to the distribution of college seats. We illustrate the potential applicability of our results with an empirical estimation that uses data on college admissions in Turkey. We find that a policy that pools a large fraction of the lowest-performing students leads to a Pareto improvement in a contest based on the estimated parameters. A laboratory experiment based on the estimated parameters generally supports our theoretical predictions.

DOI

10.1093/restud/rdaf033

Volume

93 (1)

Pages

629-663

Language

en

Export

BibTeX

Sources

openalex crossref