Using State Administrative Data to Measure Program Performance
The Review of Economics and Statistics
2007
We use administrative data from Missouri to examine the sensitivity of earnings impact estimates for a job training program based on alternative nonexperimental methods. We consider regression adjustment, Mahalanobis distance matching, and various methods using propensity-score matching, examining both cross-sectional estimates and difference-in-difference estimates. Specification tests suggest that the difference-in-difference estimator may provide a better measure of program impact. We find that propensity-score matching is most effective, but the detailed implementation is not of critical importance. Our analyses demonstrate that existing data can be used to obtain useful estimates of program impact.
- DOI
- 10.1162/rest.89.4.761
- Volume
- 89 (4)
- Pages
- 761-783
- Language
- en
- Export
- BibTeX
- Sources
- openalex crossref