Do Anti-Poverty Programs Sway Voters? Experimental Evidence from Uganda

Christopher Blattman; Mathilde Emeriau; Nathan Fiala

doi:10.1162/rest_a_00737

Do Anti-Poverty Programs Sway Voters? Experimental Evidence from Uganda

Christopher Blattman¹; Mathilde Emeriau²; Nathan Fiala³

¹ University of Chicago · ² Stanford University · ³ University of Connecticut, Agricultural and Resource Economics, Makerere University, and RWI—Leibniz Institute for Economic Research

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2018 open access

High-impact policies may not lead to support for the political party that introduces them. In 2008, Uganda’s government encouraged groups of youth to submit proposals to start enterprises. Of 535 eligible groups, a random 265 received grants of nearly $400 per person. Prior work showed that after four years, the Youth Opportunities Program raised employment by 17% and earnings by 38%. Here we show that recipients were no more likely to support the ruling party in elections. Rather, recipients slightly increased campaigning and voting for the opposition. Potential mechanisms include program misattribution, group socialization, and financial independence freeing voters from transactional voting.

DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00737
Volume: 100 (5)
Pages: 891-905
Language: en
Export: BibTeX
Sources: openalex crossref