← Search

Technology and Voter Intent: Evidence from the California Recall Election

Thomas S. Dee

Swarthmore College

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2007

Conventional evaluations of voting systems focus on ballots for which no vote can be recorded (that is, “residual” votes). However, recorded votes that misrepresent voter intent are another potentially important, but less easily measured, source of error. I present evidence that a nontrivial number of voters in the recent California recall election mistakenly voted for one of the four candidates positioned next to the two major candidates on the ballot. I also find that punch-card systems significantly increased the frequency of these errors. These results indicate that future assessments of voting technologies should consider their effects on both recorded and residual votes.

DOI
10.1162/rest.89.4.674
Volume
89 (4)
Pages
674-683
Language
en
Export
BibTeX
Sources
openalex crossref