← Search

IPO Post-Issue Markets: Questionable Predilections But Diligent Learners?

Peter Bossaerts1,2; Pierre Hillion3

1 California Institute of Technology · 2 Center for Economic and Policy Research · 3 Institut National de Statistique et d'Economie Appliquée

The Review of Economics and Statistics 2001 open access

There appear to be no anomalies in the aftermarket of a sample of 4,848 U.S. IPOs over the period 1975 to 1995, except issues offered below $6. Risk is priced in the aftermarket in accordance with Rubin-stein's asset-pricing model. Unlike under the efficient markets hypothesis (EMH), however, market priors about the probability of future default are not unbiased at the IPO date. Still, subsequent learning is rational: the market uses Bayes' law with a correct-likelihood function (of news given the eventual fate of an issue). That is, the hypothesis of an efficiently learning market (ELM) cannot be rejected. We produce direct evidence in support of these statements, based on a new class of tests. We also provide indirect evidence, by documenting a gradual convergence of IPO prices towards EMH as issues mature.

DOI
10.1162/00346530151143860
Volume
83 (2)
Pages
333-347
Language
en
Export
BibTeX
Sources
openalex crossref