← Search

Interesting Questions in Freakonomics

John DiNardo

University of Michigan

Journal of Economic Literature 2007

Freakonomics is more about “entertainment” than it is a serious attempt at popularization. Consequently, rather than conduct a comprehensive fact check, I use the book as a springboard for a broader inquiry into social science research and take issue with the book's surprising premise that “Economics is a science with excellent tools for gaining answers but a serious shortage of interesting questions.” Using examples from Freakonomics, I argue that some of the questions the book addresses are “uninteresting” because it is impossible to even imagine what a good answer would look like. I conclude with some thoughts about the role of economic theory in generating interesting questions and/or answers.

DOI
10.1257/jel.45.4.973
Volume
45 (4)
Pages
973-1000
Language
en
Export
BibTeX
Sources
openalex crossref