Journal of Labor Economics Vol. 24 No. 3 2006

Evaluating the Differential Effects of Alternative Welfare‐to‐Work Training Components: A Reanalysis of the California GAIN Program

V. Joseph Hotz¹; Guido W. Imbens²; Jacob A. Klerman³

¹ University of California, Los Angeles · ² University of California, Berkeley · ³ RAND Corporation

Abstract

We show how data from an evaluation in which subjects are randomly assigned to some treatment versus a control group can be combined with nonexperimental methods to estimate the differential effects of alternative treatments. We propose tests for the validity of these methods. We use these methods and tests to analyze the differential effects of labor force attachment (LFA) versus human capital development (HCD) training components with data from California’s Greater Avenues to Independence (GAIN) program. While LFA is more effective than HCD training in the short term, we find that HCD is relatively more effective in the longer term.

DOI

10.1086/505050

Volume

24

Issue

3

Pages

521-566

Language

en

Sources

openalex crossref

Cite

APA 7 MLA 9 Chicago (author–date) Harvard Elsevier Harvard (JFE, JBF…) The Accounting Review Academy of Management American Marketing Association INFORMS (Management Science) Copy citation Copied ✓