← Search

When Payment Undermines the Pitch

Alixandra Barasch1; Jonathan Z. Berman2; Deborah A. Small3

1 Department of Marketing, Stern School of Business, New York University · 2 Department of Marketing, London Business School · 3 Department of Marketing, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Psychological Science 2016

Studies on crowding out document that incentives sometimes backfire—decreasing motivation in prosocial tasks. In the present research, we demonstrated an additional channel through which incentives can be harmful. Incentivized advocates for a cause are perceived as less sincere than nonincentivized advocates and are ultimately less effective in persuading other people to donate. Further, the negative effects of incentives hold only when the incentives imply a selfish motive; advocates who are offered a matching incentive (i.e., who are told that the donations they successfully solicit will be matched), which is not incompatible with altruism, perform just as well as those who are not incentivized. Thus, incentives may affect prosocial outcomes in ways not previously investigated: by crowding out individuals’ sincerity of expression and thus their ability to gain support for a cause.

DOI
10.1177/0956797616638841
Volume
27 (10)
Pages
1388-1397
Language
en
Export
BibTeX
Sources
crossref