Journal of Applied Psychology 1992
Construct validity of self- and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment center.
Abstract
The construct validity of final self- and peer evaluations in an assessment center was examined within a nomological network of conceptually related and unrelated variables. Data included self-, peer, and assessor evaluations, cognitive ability and personality measures, and job advancement. The evidence for construct validity was stronger for peer than for self-evaluations, and for more easily observable dimensions than for dimensions requiring greater inferential judgment. Self- and peer evaluations were associated with assessor ratings of management potential, whereas only peer evaluations predicted job advancement. Implications for the use of self- and peer evaluations in assessment centers and the need for further research are discussed. Extensive research on assessment centers shows that assessor ratings are valid predictors of a variety of criteria (Gaugler,
- DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.42
- Sources
- openalex