← Search

Journal of Corporate Finance Vol. 101 2026

Co-opted boards and anti-takeover provisions in US firms: Do better financial outcomes and dynamic governance matter?

Mohammad Dulal Miah1; Rashedul Hasan2; Sabur Mollah3,4; Arun Upadhyay5

1 College of Banking and Financial Studies, Muscat, Oman · 2 Swansea University · 3 Gettysburg College · 4 University of Sheffield · 5 Florida International University

open access

Abstract

This research examines the relationship between co-opted boards and firms' anti-takeover provisions (ATPs). Analyzing 5585 US firm-year observations for the period 2012–2022, we document a positive relationship between co-opted boards and ATPs. We further illustrate that the positive relationship is stronger in firms that exhibit subpar performance and compensate senior executives and directors more than the industry average. Furthermore, our research finds that good governance, board and executive gender diversity, gender equality, and board cultural diversity moderate the positive relationship between co-opted boards and ATPs. Our results remain robust across a battery of tests. The findings of this research have important implications for corporate boards and managers. The study contributes to the mainstream agency theory by demonstrating that co-opted boards exacerbate firms' agency problems by blocking the potential of external disciplinary mechanisms.

DOI
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2026.103064
Volume
101
Pages
103064
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref

Cite