Knowledge that Transforms
To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
Fields:
70 results
✕ Clear filters
組織開発から理解する変化の実践で結びつけられる知識と思想 (特集 現場の実践に関わることの意味)
組織の中でのナラティブ・アプローチの実践 : 障害大学生支援を対象としたアクション・リサーチを振り返って (特集 現場の実践に関わることの意味)
社会科学と歴史学の統合の可能性 (特集 経営現象の因果関係を探る方法論)
組織文化の海外移転について,我々が知り得ていることと,これからの方向性 (特集 国際的な知識移転の新潮流を探る)
エスノグラフィを実践することの可能性 : 文化人類学の視角と方法論を実務に活かす (特集 現場の実践に関わることの意味)
A Comparative Study on R&D Organizations in Specialized Manufacturer and Generalized Manufacturer: A Case Analysis in the Vacuum Fluorescent Display Industry
Micro-processes of agency in emergent situations
The Theoretical Development of Studies on High Reliability Organizations: An Integrative Framework for Managing the Duality of Structural Control and Social Control
Market Mediators and the Trade-offs of Legitimacy-Seeking Behaviors in a Nascent Category
Although existing research has demonstrated the importance of attaining legitimacy for new market categories, few scholars have considered the trade-offs associated with such actions. Using the U.S. organic food product category as a context, we explore how one standards-based certification organization—the California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF)—sought to balance efforts to legitimate a nascent market category with retaining a shared, distinctive identity among its members. Our findings suggest that legitimacy-seeking behaviors undertaken by the standards organization diluted the initial collective identity and founding ethos of its membership. However, by shifting the meaning of “organic” from the producer to the product, CCOF was able to strengthen the categorical boundary, thereby enhancing its legitimacy. By showing how the organization managed the associated trade-offs, this study highlights the double-edged nature of legitimacy and offers important implications for the literatures on legitimacy and new market category formation. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1126 .