Knowledge that Transforms

The sensitivity of the external finance premium to firms’ net-worth-to-capital ratio is central to the strength of the financial accelerator, yet direct firm-level evidence remains scarce. We estimate this elasticity using balance sheet and income statement data for Swiss nonfinancial firms over 1998–2016. To address the endogeneity of net worth, we employ two complementary instrumental variable strategies: one based on firms’ non-operating income and the other a shift-share design that interacts predetermined exposure to financial income with aggregate dividend returns. Mapping the estimated elasticity into the costly state verification framework as implemented by Bernanke et al. (1999) yields structural monitoring costs of about one quarter of firms’ gross return on capital, with estimates ranging from 0.15 to 0.35 across specifications. Our results provide direct firm-level support for the financial accelerator mechanism and imply monitoring costs of the same order of magnitude as the benchmark calibration of Bernanke et al. (1999).

We examine how in-person and virtual interactions shape mutual fund investment decisions using a comprehensive dataset of corporate site visits. Before COVID-19, fund pairs jointly attending in-person visits trade more similarly (by 20% of a standard deviation) than matched controls. The effect holds for stocks unrelated to the hosting firm and appears in firm-level, industry, geographic, and asset allocation decisions; it is stronger among managers with prior familiarity, similar seniority, and mixed gender. Stocks purchased by jointly visiting funds earn higher subsequent returns, indicating that these exchanges convey valuable information. Exploiting the exogenous shift to virtual communication induced by COVID-19, we find that in-person visits remain associated with correlated trading during the pandemic, whereas virtual visits have substantially weaker effects. A survey of fund managers confirms that site visits prompt information exchange, follow-up research, and portfolio adjustments. In-person interactions appear central to information acquisition; and virtual interactions do not easily replicate this function.

This paper documents a non-monotonic impact of local mutual funds on the pricing of municipal bond issuance. Offering yield spreads are higher in states where municipal bond funds’ headquarters are located, and in states with larger aggregate local fund size. However, controlling for local fund size, yield spreads decrease as the number of local fund families increases. These findings are consistent with a security pricing model with multiple imperfectly informed investors and with the empirical evidence supporting local funds’ informational advantage. Specifically, mutual fund trades predict local bonds’ credit rating changes.

Investment funds hold disproportionately more domestic than foreign stocks, which has been attributed to stock market development and familiarity factors such as language and distance. However, the literature typically assumes that funds represent investors in their country of incorporation, neglecting the substantial allocation of investors’ assets to foreign funds domiciled in financial centers. Using a novel “look-through approach” that combines supervisory holdings statistics with granular security-level fund portfolios, we provide a more accurate view of investors’ indirect equity allocations, independent of the fund’s legal country of incorporation. Our findings reveal three key insights. First, home bias estimates are significantly smaller than previously documented, reflecting greater geographical portfolio diversification through investment funds. Second, in most euro area countries, home bias is primarily driven by country-specific rather than common-currency preferences. Third, familiarity plays a larger role in cross-border investments for households than for institutional fund investors, highlighting the importance of investor sophistication.

We propose that the arrival of new information is a source of systematic risk for the holder of a financial security. Using several measures of information flows, we demonstrate that a stock’s sensitivity to market-wide information flow is associated with a robust cross-sectional return premium that is distinct from other return premia. We find that the amount of information impounded in prices through trading has increased in recent years consistent with declining trading costs and the rise of algorithmic trading. We show that the information flows risk premium is increasing through time.

We utilize the Eurosystem securities lending facilities as a laboratory to investigate the impact of collateral scarcity on market functioning. The reduction of securities lending fees, implemented in November 2020, provides a quasi-natural experiment for our analyses. This policy change results in a surge in the utilization of securities lending facilities, particularly for bonds with limited supply elasticity in the repo market. We find no evidence of substitution effects; instead, the overall activity in the repo market expands through the collateral multiplier. The improved pricing conditions alleviate collateral scarcity and enhance market quality in both the repo and cash markets.

We examine the causal effects of a policy allowing early withdrawal of pension funds on individuals’ investment behavior. Upon turning 55, eligible individuals may withdraw a portion of their pension savings. Using detailed brokerage data, we find that this liquidity access triggers increased trading of 9% to 33%, especially in riskier, leveraged assets, without improving investment performance. The resulting increase in trading costs and portfolio volatility, particularly among males and lower-income investors, ultimately diminishes retirement wealth.

We exploit unexpected corporate data breaches to study the loss and repair of corporate reputation. Reputation loss decreases equity and brand values, increases customer churn, and prompts more negative media coverage. Firms repair their reputation by increasing their charitable donations and have CSR scores that are more than 0.5 standard deviations higher. They increase political contributions, employee wages, and IT investment. These actions are targeted to stakeholders that are particularly important or in situations that are particularly salient to their stakeholders. We observe similar dynamics of reputation loss and repair following the release of negative news about firms’ social behaviors.

We provide novel evidence on the role of firms’ banking relationships with government banks (GOBs) during a climate-related shock when relief funds are unavailable. Using variation in the locations of rainfall shocks and firms’ banking relationships, we find that firms maintaining exclusive banking relationships with GOBs (GOB firms) secure more debt relative to other firms during rainfall shocks. We do not find such effects for firms that maintain exclusive relationships with private banks, foreign banks, or maintain multiple banking relationships. We also find that GOB relationships are particularly beneficial for firms that are more vulnerable to rainfall shocks, have long-term relationships with GOBs, and are, at the same time, healthier compared to other firms. With regard to real effects, GOB firms invest more and remain profitable than other firms during rainfall shocks. Overall, our results highlight the benefits of GOB relationships for firms during climate shocks.

We study the impact of ring-fencing on bank riskiness using short-term money markets. Ring-fencing is when the government restricts some banking activities to a subsidiary of the group whilst restricting intra-group transfers. Exploiting confidential data on sterling-denominated repo transactions, we document that banking groups subject to ring-fencing are perceived to be safer—repo investors lend to ring-fenced groups at lower rates—and that the safety perception is amplified during times of market stress. We show that ring-fenced groups also intermediate more cautiously. Our article suggests that structural reforms can create a “safe-haven” bank in the financial system.