We develop a political economy model where loss aversion and reference dependence are important in shaping people's preferences over trade policy. The policy implications of the augmented model differ in three ways: there is a region of compensating protection, where a decline in the world price leads to an offsetting increase in protection, such that a constant domestic price is maintained; protection following a single negative price shock will be persistent; and irrespective of the extent of lobbying, there will be a deviation from free trade that favors loss-making industries. The augmented model explains protections of the US steel industry since 1980. (JEL F13, F14, L61)

We show that very large firms shape country export patterns. Among 32 countries, the top firm on average accounts for 14% of a country’s total (nonoil) exports, and the top five firms make up 30%. These export superstars are also important in the sectoral distribution of exports. Variation in exports from the top firm in a country explains about one-third of the variation in sectoral exports relative to income across countries, and variation in exports from the top five firms explains nearly half. Revealed comparative advantage in a sector can be created by a single firm.

The scope for growth of trade in services is vast. Although services currently make up over 60 percent of world production, they account for only about 20 percent of world trade. A primary reason why international trade in services has been limited is that the performance of many services necessitates physical contact between producers and consumers, a condition that renders service provision to distant locations infeasible. New technology, in particular, the Internet, provides a medium of exchange that overcomes such historical trading hurdles for many services, effectively reducing transport costs from infinity to virtually nothing. There is ample anecdotal evidence that the Internet is having just this sort of an effect on services trade. The accounting firm Netlink maintains the books for 6,000 employees in Reyanosa, Mexico, from their offices in Manhattan. Infosys of India provides softwareconsulting services to international clients, including Apple Computers, Lucent Technologies, and Microsoft. A medical-transcription company in South Africa, ITS, receives digital recordings from abroad electronically and returns a transcribed text file the next day. Still, the question remains as to whether electronic sharing of information is an important enough development to alter significantly the geography of service provision. Indeed, many services need to be tailored to the consumer’s needs and monitored for quality, and these are likely to be more effective if the provider is close by and speaks the same language. In addition, in the event of a dispute, resolution will be less complicated if both parties are subject to the same legal system. Finally, there may be security concerns with allowing foreign access to some documents or systems. Thus, for some services, especially those where familiarity, communication, and non-standardization contribute to quality, the Internet would not be expected to have a large impact on international trade. To determine whether the Internet has significantly affected international service provision in practice, we estimate a general model of services trade across countries and examine whether the inclusion of data on Internet penetration, as measured by the number of Internet hosts in a country, is statistically significant. Overall, our results offer evidence that the Internet is related to growth in services trade. After controlling for GDP and exchange-rate movements, we find that a 10-percent increase in Internet penetration in a foreign country is associated with about a 1.7-percentage-point increase in export growth and a 1.1-percentagepoint increase in import growth. The results are robust to a number of alternative specifications.

We examine the effect of regionalism on unilateral trade liberalization using industry-level data on applied most-favored nation (MFN) tariffs and bilateral preferences for ten Latin American countries from 1990 to 2001. We find that preferential tariff reduction in a given sector leads to a reduction in the external (MFN) tariff in that sector. External liberalization is greater if preferences are granted to important suppliers. However, these “complementarity effects” of preferential liberalization on external liberalization do not arise in customs unions. Overall, our results suggest that concerns about a negative effect of preferential liberalization on external trade liberalization are unfounded.

We determine how time delays affect trade, using newly collected data on the days it takes to move standard cargo from the factory gate to the ship in 98 countries. We estimate a difference gravity equation and find that each additional day that a product is delayed prior to being shipped reduces trade by more than 1%. Put differently, each day is equivalent to a country distancing itself from its trade partners by about 70 km on average. We also find that delays have a relatively greater impact on exports of time-sensitive goods, such as perishable agricultural products.