We examine the role of race and ethnicity in the mutual fund context at two distinct levels. At the fund manager level, we document a co-racial tilt—funds managed by minority-dominant (White-dominant) teams allocate larger portfolio weights to minority-led (White-led) firms. This tilt is not associated with superior performance. It diminishes as fund managers gain experience, suggesting the presence of inaccurate statistical discrimination. At the investor level, we find that minority-dominant funds are penalized similarly to White-dominant funds for poor performance but are not rewarded as much for superior performance. Overall, our results uncover race-related investment choices at both levels.

To safeguard its technological leadership, the U.S. has restricted domestic suppliers from exporting cutting-edge technologies to selected Chinese firms. Domestic firms affected by these export controls halt sales to Chinese customers, as intended, but struggle to establish new relations with alternative customers domestically or in politically aligned regions. Consequently, domestic suppliers experience sizable losses in market capitalization, along with reductions in profitability, employment, and bank lending. Chinese firms are more proactive in reconfiguring supply chains, though not without costs. Overall, export controls impose larger costs on U.S. firms developing the very technologies these policies aim to protect.