Knowledge that Transforms

Firms’ green technology investments are increasingly important for competitive positioning, yet their impact on long-run performance remains unclear. Using electricity capacity data for global utility firms, we construct a unique structural measure of technological greenness based on renewable versus fossil fuel physical infrastructure. We find that adopting sustainable technologies is followed by a long-run improvement in corporate fundamentals that is only partially reflected in stock prices, yielding superior returns over a multi-year horizon. These results partly reflect higher revenue growth in liberalized retail markets rather than investor sentiment, revealing a consumer-based mechanism that likely extends to competitive downstream sectors.

We survey 153 empirical studies of family firms and document 192 operational definitions representing 25 distinct definition types. These definitions can be decomposed into five recurring, codable dimensions: ownership, management, board representation, embeddedness, and succession. We relate these dimensions to economic mechanisms including agency conflicts, residual control rights, transaction costs, and dynastic control. Alternative definitions select systematically different populations and yield materially different estimates of firm performance and innovation. Definition choice is largely unrelated to the research question, except in succession studies. Ownership thresholds track private enforcement of self-dealing rules, but not statutory shareholder rights or rule of law. We conclude that the family firm is a family of related constructs rather than a single latent construct. Definitions should therefore match the family-firm construct implied by the research question, and results should be reported across alternative classification rules.

We demonstrate how private equity (PE) promotes nonbank lending by substituting for bank monitoring. Relative to non-PE-backed loans, PE-backed loans exhibit lower bank monitoring, smaller loan shares retained by lead banks, and larger shares held by nonbanks. The substitution is strongest when sponsors have greater incentives to engage with portfolio firms, is not associated with weaker loan performance, and persists during borrower distress. Our findings suggest that PE sponsors’ active engagement—through monitoring and support in distress—reduces banks’ need for monitoring and information production, enabling them to retain less skin in the game and sell loans to nonbanks.

We examine how different forms of government intervention - explicit deposit insurance, implicit guarantees from nationalization, and assurance effects from re-privatization - shape depositor behavior during a banking crisis. Using proprietary monthly account-level data, we show that depositors respond to formal insurance limits even in an environment of broad state support, but adjust only partially. Stabilization is markedly stronger after the takeover by a financially strong private bank than during state ownership, despite unchanged statutory coverage. These patterns are inconsistent with a strong bailout-expectations view in which explicit insurance is largely irrelevant and instead point to credibility as a key determinant of depositor behavior. We further show that political trust amplifies the effectiveness of government guarantees. Overall, our findings highlight that the form and credibility of government backstops, rather than coverage levels alone, are central to retail deposit funding stability during crises.

Using analyst-lender affiliation in syndicated loans as a proxy for differential access to private information, we examine how unaffiliated analysts respond to this disadvantage. We find that unaffiliated analysts are more likely to herd toward affiliated analysts following loan origination, leading to improved forecast accuracy but weaker market reactions, consistent with reduced information content. In addition, herding analysts improve their forecast accuracy for other firms in their portfolios relative to nonherding analysts, suggesting a reallocation of effort. To capture information acquisition directly, we analyze IP address data from SEC EDGAR log files and find that unaffiliated analysts increase search activity, driven primarily by those not designated as herding. Although herding behavior wanes after the first year post-loan, elevated EDGAR searches persist for three years. Overall, our study provides novel evidence on how selective access to private information influences analysts’ competitive behavior. Data Availability: Data used in this study are available from public sources identified in the text, subject to the terms and conditions of those sources.

Does going public affect the amount and type of corporate international tax planning? Using a panel of U.S. corporate tax return data from 2004 to 2018, we show that IPO completion is associated with the rapid implementation of multinational foreign tax structures. Specifically, within three years after filing for an IPO, firms (1) expand their presence in low-tax jurisdictions, (2) enter into cross-border agreements that accompany intangible asset transfers to foreign subsidiaries, and (3) increase the likelihood and level of foreign related-party income-shifting payments. Effects are strongest among firms with strong capital market pressure to hit post-IPO earnings targets, firms with high R&D spending pre-IPO, and firms with limited ability to use net operating loss carryforwards. We contribute to the nascent literature studying tax implications of IPOs by documenting the types and timing of specific tax strategies that enable public firms to remain lightly taxed in the post-IPO period.