This study investigates the effect of subordinate perceptions of the legitimacy of the superior in her role on subordinate misreporting. Using social norm theory regarding property rights, we predict that when subordinates perceive a superior as having more role legitimacy, they perceive the superior as being a more rightful claimant of project profits, which reduces misreporting. We test this prediction using a participative budgeting experiment that manipulates perceptions of the superior's role legitimacy. We find that budgetary slack is lower when subordinates perceive superiors to be legitimate in their roles than when subordinates perceive superiors to be illegitimate. Further, comparisons to a baseline treatment intended to induce neutral perceptions of role legitimacy, as in prior research, suggest that superior role legitimacy decreases slack. Supplemental experiments suggest that these results are generally robust to several design choices. The results from our three experiments suggest that role legitimacy decreases slack relative to random (neutral) perceptions; however, we do not find a statistically significant increase in slack from role illegitimacy relative to random perceptions across our three experiments. We discuss methodological implications from focusing on promoting role legitimacy and implications for practice, which has largely focused on problems from, and avoidance of, illegitimacy.

ABSTRACT Many organizations offer profit sharing plans to motivate increased effort and goal congruence. However, an unintended consequence of such plans may be to reduce honesty in managerial reporting. We investigate two commonly observed profit sharing plans (individual and pooled) in a laboratory experiment where multiple agents with private cost information submit budget requests to an employer. Consistent with our prediction based on crowding theory, our findings suggest that honesty is reduced in the presence of an individual profit sharing plan. However, when a pooled profit sharing plan is used, the adverse effects on honesty are partially mitigated. Our results suggest that an unintended consequence of profit sharing (decreased honesty) can be mitigated through interdependency from pooled plans. The results have practical implications, given that organizations have flexibility in establishing both the size and scope of their profit sharing plans. Our study also contributes to our understanding of reporting behavior, particularly in multi‐agent settings.

We experimentally investigate how increases in legally required minimum wages affect wage offers, wage premiums (i.e., the excess of wages over the minimum wage), and employee effort. Prior research has documented a gift-exchange relationship between firms and employees, whereby higher wage offers lead to higher effort. However, when the minimum wage increases, expectations regarding gift wages may also change. We predict that, following such a change, firms and employees will self-servingly determine their reference point for gift wages. As a result, while firms will increase wage offers, wage premiums will decline, and thus employees will not increase their effort. The results of (1) a laboratory experiment and (2) two online experiments are consistent with our predictions, suggesting that minimum-wage increases can have a negative effect on employee effort. Ultimately, employees respond to equivalent wages differently depending on the context surrounding the wage level. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

ABSTRACT This study examines the benefits of employee involvement in feedback system design for cooperation. Understanding how to enhance cooperation is important given the increasing use of team settings in practice. Control systems often provide feedback on cooperative actions of coworkers, which can help enable cooperation in teams and between organizational units. We predict that involvement in the design of feedback systems can be a source of trust between employees and enhances cooperation. This is particularly important for dynamic environments, in which an incomplete feedback system which initially provides perfect signals of cooperation no longer does so after the environment changes. Adding to prior evidence, we find that an incomplete feedback system can benefit cooperation in a static environment, but the benefit is greater when employees were initially involved in its design. In a dynamic environment, an incomplete feedback system fails to facilitate cooperation unless employees were involved in its design. Our results identify a behavioral benefit for firms that grant decision rights to employees as part of their organizational architecture.

ABSTRACT We experimentally investigate how subordinates’ budget reporting in hierarchical organizations is influenced by social distance between subordinates and their direct manager. Although prior research promotes reducing this social distance to improve cooperation and efficiency, we contend that reduced social distance can differentially influence budget reporting, conditional on the manager’s stake in the residual claim. As predicted, we find through two studies that the effect of reduced social distance changes from increasing subordinates’ honesty to decreasing subordinates’ honesty as the manager’s stake in the residual claim decreases. We also find that subordinates’ concern for the manager’s economic well-being and concern about the manager’s impression of their reporting behavior mediate these results. The implications of our findings for management accounting theory and practice are discussed. Data Availability: Please contact the authors. JEL Classifications: C91; D91; M41.