We study how capital account liberalization affects technological innovation. We provide robust evidence that industries more dependent on external finance have disproportionately higher innovation performance in economies with a more liberalized capital account. Among the components of capital account liberalization, although both equity market liberalization and outward FDI by domestic firms have sizable effects on innovation, they affect it differently. While equity market liberalization helps alleviate financial constraints by facilitating access to external finance, outward FDI by domestic firms promotes innovative activities by increasing internal finance from foreign operations. Further analysis indicates that the innovation-enhancing effects of capital account liberalization are limited mainly to countries with relatively well-developed financial systems and strong institutional quality, even in periods of financial crisis

This paper examines the optimal incentive scheme in motivating people to innovate under ambiguity. When an innovation’s prospects are ambiguous, the use of extrinsic, high-powered incentives can lead the agent’s beliefs about the project’s outcome to deviate from that of the principal’s, which consequently deters innovation. The deterrent effect, however, is alleviated for firms in which agents have strong intrinsic incentives to adhere to firms’ goals and missions. In equilibrium, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives are complementary, and firms that face greater uncertainty invest more in fostering intrinsic incentives. Hence, firms that pursue more exploratory and radical innovation invest more in creating corporate identity and culture

Firms invest in Corporate venture capital (CVC) for strategic reasons. Consistent with maintaining financial flexibility to fund CVC driven innovation and acquisitions, CVC investing firms hold less debt and more cash. Our results are more pronounced among the highest CVC investors and strategically driven CVC investors as such firms maintain the most conservative financial policies. CVC firms are more likely to acquire using cash and this relationship is more pronounced among strategic CVC firms. Overall, our results are consistent with studies that advances that firms with growth or investment opportunities maintain financial flexibility

Multivariate GARCH models do not perform well in large dimensions due to the so-called curse of dimensionality. The recent DCC-NL model of Engle et al. (2019) is able to overcome this curse via nonlinear shrinkage estimation of the unconditional correlation matrix. In this paper, we show how performance can be increased further by using open/high/low/close (OHLC) price data instead of simply using daily returns. A key innovation, for the improved modeling of not only dynamic variances but also of dynamic correlations, is the concept of a regularized return, obtained from a volatility proxy in conjunction with a smoothed sign of the observed return

We show that private equity-sponsored public-to-private buyouts in the US evoke positive externality effects among their targets’ industry peers. Industrial organization and strategic theory suggest buyouts may impact their industry peers as a result of increased takeover threat and competitive pressure felt by the peers. We document that buyouts are associated with positive market returns and better fundamental performance in the three years following a buyout acquisition in the industry. Drilling down into specific channels of improvement, we document that industry peers mitigate the increased takeover threat and competitive pressure by significantly improving several dimensions of operational efficiency, by engaging in long-term innovation and by enhancing their corporate governance. Our results suggest that competitive factors rather than takeover threat is responsible for the spillover effects

Propelled by the recent financial product innovations involving derivatives, securitization and mortgages, commercial banks are becoming more complex, branching out into many “nontraditional” banking operations beyond issuance of loans. This broadening of operational scope in a pursuit of revenue diversification may be beneficial if banks exhibit scope economies. The existing (two-decade-old) empirical evidence lends no support for such product-scope-driven cost economies in banking, but it is greatly outdated and, surprisingly, there has been little (if any) research on this subject despite the drastic transformations that the U.S. banking industry has undergone over the past two decades in the wake of technological advancements and regulatory changes. Commercial banks have significantly shifted towards nontraditional operations, making the portfolio of products offered by present-day banks very different from that two decades ago. In this paper, we provide new and more robust evidence about scope economies in U.S. commercial banking. We improve upon the prior literature not only by analyzing the most recent data and accounting for banks’ nontraditional off-balance sheet operations, but also in multiple methodological ways. To test for scope economies, we estimate a flexible time-varying-coefficient panel-data quantile regression model which accommodates three-way heterogeneity across banks. Our results provide strong evidence in support of significantly positive scope economies across banks of virtually all sizes. Contrary to earlier studies, we find no empirical corroboration for scope diseconomies