We infer the employment response to a minimum wage change by calibrating a model of employment for the restaurant industry. Whereas perfect competition implies that employment falls and prices rise after a minimum wage increase, the monopsony model potentially implies the opposite. We show that estimated price responses are consistent with the competitive model. We place fairly tight bounds on the employment response, with the most plausible parameter values suggesting that a 10% increase in the minimum wage lowers low‐skill employment by 2%–4% and total restaurant employment by 1%–3%.

This article identifies the part‐time wage effect, using hours variation caused by the social security rules. We show that work hours and wages drop sharply at ages 62 and 65. We argue that the hours decline causes the wage decline, resulting in a 25% wage penalty for men who cut their work week from 40 to 20 hours. However, we find little evidence for such an effect among women. We also show that models that fail to account for the joint determination of hours and wages will understate the labor supply response to a tax change by about 26%.

We estimate the importance of teachers in Chicago public high schools using matched student-teacher administrative data. A one standard deviation, one semester improvement in math teacher quality raises student math scores by 0.13 grade equivalents or, over 1 year, roughly one-fifth of average yearly gains. Estimates are relatively stable over time, reasonably impervious to a variety of conditioning variables, and do not appear to be driven by classroom sorting or selective score reporting. Also, teacher quality is particularly important for lower-ability students. Finally, traditional human capital measures—including those determining compensation—explain little of the variation in estimated quality.

Joseph Altonji is one of the pioneers of modern labor economics. To mark Joe’s sixty-fifth birthday and honor his illustrious career, a conference was held at his alma mater and employer, Yale University, on September 7–8, 2018. This special issue contains seven of the papers presented by former students, coauthors, and colleagues. Joe has been central to the empirical revolution that has brought vast amounts of individual-level data to some of the most important questions ofbothmicroandmacroeconomics.His seminal breakthroughshave changed thewaywe think aboutnumerous topics, including the studyof consumption behavior and labor supply over time, intrafamily insurance, discrimination, wage determination and learning, school choice and school quality, returns to higher education, and the stochastic process of income. The hallmark of all thiswork is a thoughtful combination of theory anddata, the development ofnewempiricalmethods, thediscoveryofnovel identificationstrategies, and extreme care with extensive robustness checks and attention to data details. Early on in his career Joe was one of the first to develop our understanding of the relationship between intratemporal and intertemporal allocations and the implication this distinction has on estimating elasticities. These

How does school quality affect health amid multiple behavioral responses? The Rosenwald schools transformed school quality for rural southern African Americans in the early 1900s. Research shows that the schools made black migration northward more likely and that the Great Migration shortened life expectancy for these migrants. Besides the hypothesized health-enhancing effects of school quality, negative health effects might also occur through migration. We disentangle behavioral mechanisms and find complete exposure to the Rosenwald schools increased life expectancy by 2–3 months; a more naive approach finds no relationship. Results are robust to heterogeneous treatment effects and various measurement issues.