We collect and analyze detailed filings from global institutional investors to estimate foreign investors’ U.S. dollar (USD) security holdings and currency hedging. Over two decades, foreign USD holdings grew sixfold, while hedge ratios rose by 15 percentage points after the 2008–2009 crisis. Currency hedging across mutual funds, pensions, and insurance reached $2 trillion by 2019. Hedging demand varies across investors, currency areas, and banking systems. We show that expected FX returns, beyond variance minimization, drive currency exposure in portfolios. Finally, we demonstrate and quantify how aggregate hedging demand affects hedging costs in the presence of constrained intermediaries.

We provide a comprehensive account of the evolution of the currency composition of sovereign and corporate external borrowing by emerging markets from 2003 to 2017. We show that a higher reliance on foreign currency debt by the corporate sector is associated with higher sovereign default risk. We introduce local currency sovereign debt and private sector currency mismatch into a standard sovereign debt model to examine how the currency composition of corporate borrowing affects the sovereign’s incentive to inflate or default. A calibration of the model generates the empirical patterns of sovereign credit risk.

Violations of no-arbitrage conditions measure the shadow cost of intermediary constraints. Intermediary asset pricing and intertemporal hedging together imply that the risk of these constraints tightening is priced. We describe a “forward CIP trading strategy” that bets on CIP violations shrinking and show that its returns help identify the price of this risk. This strategy yields the highest returns for currency pairs associated with the carry trade. The strategy’s risk substantially contributes to the volatility of the stochastic discount factor, is correlated with both other near-arbitrages and intermediary wealth measures, and appears to be consistently priced across various asset classes.