Knowledge that Transforms

ABSTRACT This paper examines whether U.S. domestic firms’ investment decisions are affected by their expectations of market leaders’ tax-motivated income shifting. Market leaders’ financial reports can help peers evaluate industry conditions and potential investment payoffs, but income shifting obscures the geographic source of profits and reduces the informativeness of these disclosures. Thus, when peers expect that leaders shift income, they face greater uncertainty about the outcomes of their own investments. Consistent with the theory of investment under uncertainty, we find that U.S. domestic firms are less responsive to investment opportunities as expectations of leaders’ shifting increase. This reduced responsiveness is concentrated among firms facing higher investment irreversibility and those whose market leaders provide less transparent geographic disclosures. Our findings identify a novel spillover cost of income shifting and suggest that policies enhancing the transparency of multinational firms’ geographic reporting or constraining income shifting could help improve domestic firms’ investment decisions.

ABSTRACT We study the desirability of transparent accounting information for banks depending on their liability structure. In our model, a bank finances a long-term project with both uninsured and insured deposits. Although uninsured deposits increase rollover risk, they may also generate efficient liquidations. Importantly, a transparent regime provides timelier information about the project’s payoff than an opaque regime. We show that the transparent regime is surplus-enhancing when the amount of insured deposits is small, as the bank issues the optimal amount of uninsured deposits and transparency leads to efficient liquidations. Otherwise, when the amount of insured deposits is large, the cost of inefficient liquidations dominates, making the opaque regime optimal. In addition, the bank may favor transparency to reduce its funding cost even when it is surplus-decreasing. Overall, our results show that transparent accounting is not a panacea and provide some support for the “mark-to-funding” accounting rule. JEL Classifications: G20; G28; M41; M48

ABSTRACT Results from multiple experiments demonstrate that evaluators more favorably evaluate creative output produced by designers with higher expertise, even when the underlying creativity of the output is held constant (hereafter, expertise bias). We find, however, that this bias is mitigated when evaluators know that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can augment creative design processes, because AI’s capabilities reduce the perceived exclusivity of designers’ domain expertise. We also show that designers can restore the perceived exclusivity of their expertise, reestablishing the expertise bias, by choosing not to use available AI tools. Although prior research focuses on AI’s ability to enhance or inhibit the creativity of output, we highlight that it can enhance the creative process by mitigating a prevalent human bias in the subjective evaluation of this output. We also contribute to a better understanding of why some experienced designers refuse to utilize AI. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: L29; M41; M55.

ABSTRACT In April 2016, the European Union adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), significantly expanding privacy protections for personal data handled by firms. I examine the regulation’s impact on U.S. firms’ internal information quality (IIQ) and operational efficiency. Although privacy regulations target one subset of firms’ information assets (i.e., personal data), they may spur broad improvements in firms’ information governance practices and systems, resulting in higher quality information available for decision-making and, by extension, more efficient operations. Using a difference-in-differences design, I find that U.S. firms with European operations (i.e., treated firms) exhibit improvements in IIQ around the adoption of the GDPR. Furthermore, although the GDPR’s regulatory burden is overall costly to firms, GDPR-induced improvements in IIQ contribute positively to operational efficiency. These findings highlight that privacy regulation can act as a catalyst for firms to improve IIQ, yielding operational benefits that may partially offset the regulation’s costs. Data Availability: All data are available from public sources discussed in the text. JEL Classifications: L51; M40; M41; K24.

ABSTRACT We examine the impact of the SEC’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) on the role of employee gender in the Division of Corporation Finance’s filing review process. Gender bias theory suggests that women may work harder to compensate for perceived bias and discrimination. Consistent with this theory, we find that women reviewers issue longer comment letters, raise more issues, ask more accounting-specific questions, reference more authoritative guidance, request more filing amendments, follow up on more issues from prior rounds, and take longer to close the comment letter process. We also find that women are less prevalent in higher paygrades and leadership positions. These gender differences attenuate after the establishment of OMWI in 2011, but significant differences remain. Analyses of SEC employee survey data corroborate our comment letter results. Data Availability: All data are publicly available. JEL Classifications: G18; J16; M48.

ABSTRACT Recruiting talent is a major issue for the accounting profession and is especially salient for small firms with limited resources and brand recognition. In this study, we examine the challenges small accounting firms face when recruiting from universities and the strategies they use to overcome them. Drawing on interviews with 34 stakeholders (primarily recruiting specialists and human resource managers), we develop a process model of small-firm recruiting and present evidence related to each phase: (1) targeting certain universities and students, (2) engaging in university recruiting activities, (3) extending offers, and (4) aiming to evaluate recruiting outcomes. Guided by theory, our findings reveal that small accounting firms develop organizational familiarity and image with students while navigating fatalism and balancing imitation and differentiation in their recruiting strategies. We conclude with a call to reconsider the “biggest is best” assumptions that dominate mainstream accounting research and provide suggestions for future research. Data Availability: Data were obtained from interviews. JEL Classifications: M41; M42; M51.

ABSTRACT This paper examines how incumbent firms adjust their disclosure behavior in response to heightened labor market competition. Using announcements of large employer entries into local labor markets, I find that incumbent firms located in the affected counties increase the disclosure of positive, forward-looking information. This response is concentrated among incumbent firms that compete more directly with entrant firms for similar workers and is strongest in local labor markets where employee retention pressures are likely to be more severe. Additional analyses show that the response extends to qualitative disclosure, particularly job-related and reputation-enhancing press releases, is associated with more favorable subsequent employment outcomes, and is unlikely to be explained by alternative motives related to productivity spillovers, supply-chain linkages, product market competition, or capital market considerations. Overall, the evidence supports the view that firms use public disclosure to shape employee perceptions and mitigate turnover risk when competition for talent intensifies. Data Availability: Data are available from the public and commercial sources cited in the paper. JEL Classifications: M41; D22; J23; J63.

ABSTRACT Macroeconomic forces are challenging the ability of audit firms to sustain engagement profitability. Although one available strategy for multinational clients is to employ non-U.S. firms as component auditors (CAs), the impacts of this choice are unclear. We investigate the influence of CAs on engagement economics in Big 6 audits from 2012 to 2022, a period of increasing non-U.S. labor use. Results show that global hours increase with CA participation, suggesting that additional CA labor is needed to substitute for each U.S. hour. Global billing rates decline, implying that principal auditors share savings from lower cost labor with clients. However, U.S. lead team realizations rise with increasing substitution of non-U.S. labor, incentivizing more extensive CA use. Further analysis shows that these impacts are concentrated in engagements with high CA participation in countries with low wages and low English proficiency. Audit quality is not reduced by greater substitution of non-U.S. labor. JEL Classifications: M40; M42; M48; F66.

ABSTRACT Although audit regulators worldwide concur that the rigor of audit firms’ internal engagement quality reviews (EQRs) is paramount to an audit firm’s audit quality, they are concerned that relationships between audit engagement partner (AEP) and engagement review partner (ERP) working in the same firm can undermine these reviews. We utilize confidential proprietary ERP and audit adjustment data to investigate how school alma mater ties between AEPs and ERPs affect audit adjustments in China. Our results reveal that audit adjustments are significantly lower when an AEP and ERP share school ties. This effect is more pronounced when the ERP is less competent than and lacks authority over the AEP, when the ERP and AEP perform mutual reviews or previously coaudited a client, and when the AEP’s work is flawed. Finally, semistructured partner interviews corroborate our empirical findings and strengthen our practical and policy implications. Data Availability: These proprietary data were provided to us with the understanding that it would be used only for independent academic research. Our research team is obligated under nondisclosure and confidentiality conditions to not disclose or share the confidential information which includes all of the data received from the data providers of the Chinese government and not to report information in any article or presentation that would inadvertently reveal (including any potential link) the identity of the partners, firms, their characteristics, and the audit adjustment data. No other restrictions were imposed by the data providers regarding the use of the data purely for academic research purposes and in communicating the research findings. Other data not subject to this confidentiality nondisclosure are available from sources identified in the text. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.

ABSTRACT I examine whether contracts that require customers to privately share with suppliers forecasts of their future demand for the supplier’s products (“demand forecast contracts,” or “DF contracts”) affect the supplier’s reliance on an alternative information source—stock prices—when making investment decisions. If suppliers find these forecasts a more direct signal of future demand than stock prices, they may reduce their reliance on stock prices to guide investments. Using hand-collected data, I find that suppliers’ investments become significantly less sensitive to stock prices after entering a DF contract for the first time. This effect is stronger when forecasts are more credible, demand more uncertain, and investments more irreversible. Supplier performance, measured by return on assets and cash flow from operations, improves post-DF. Overall, these findings suggest that when a relatively direct information source about future demand becomes available, managers reduce their reliance on stock prices in making real decisions. Data Availability: Data are available from public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: G10; G30; G31; L14; M40; M41.