Knowledge that Transforms

To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
225 results ✕ Clear filters

Covenant Prices of U.S. Corporate Bonds

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2026 open access
Abstract In this paper, we analyze the key drivers of bond covenant prices by employing a novel measurement approach based on secondary market data. We find that covenant prices vary significantly over time and are associated with market-wide credit risk, volatility, and macroeconomic variables. Apart from the time-series dynamics, there is also significant variation across bond and firm characteristics. In particular, covenant prices increase with the riskiness of bonds and are higher for firms that have more growth options, more tangible assets, and are smaller. Furthermore, we document a positive correlation between the prices of covenants and their subsequent inclusion rates.

Cross-Sectional Identification of Private Information

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2026 16(1), 1-49 open access
Abstract We propose a new private information measure based on a model of strategic trade optimization in the cross section of securities. Investors receive liquidity and private information shocks and optimize trading across securities, accounting for price impact (Kyle’s λ). The model yields a simple private information measure: λ×OIB (order imbalance). Intuitively, order imbalance is more likely to be information-driven when trading is expensive. We validate our measure by showing that it is greater for smaller firms with higher analyst dispersion, peaks with insider trades, helps explain return reversals, predicts return volatility, and increases before M&A announcements and after analyst coverage terminations. (JEL G11, G12, G14)

Short Selling Around News in International Stock Markets

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2026 16(1), 95-132 open access
Abstract This paper examines global sources of short sellers’ informational advantage by analyzing their trading around public news releases in 38 countries. I find that shorts on negative news have stronger predictive power than nonnews shorts, but only in countries with high-quality public information, more news per stock, and higher illiquidity. These results indicate that some country-level factors discourage short sellers from trading on public information. Short sellers’ informational advantage in most countries seems to arise from their access to private information, as evidenced by their ability to anticipate future negative news and their trading in unison with insiders. (JEL: G12, G14, G15)

To Lend or Not to Lend: The Bank of Japan’s ETF Purchase Program and Securities Lending

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(3-4), 332-376 open access
Abstract This study investigates the role of passive investors in the equity lending market by utilizing the expansion of exchange-traded fund (ETF) markets due to the Bank of Japan’s (BOJ) ETF purchasing program. We find that the BOJ’s purchases increase equity prices particularly for stocks with limited availability in the equity lending market. However, over the longer term, the BOJ’s cumulative purchases reduce lending fees, thus weakening the program’s effects. These findings suggest that ETF managers supply stocks that constitute ETFs to the equity lending market, and the lending behavior of ETFs, influenced by the BOJ’s program, alleviates short-selling constraints. (JEL E52, E58, G12, G14)

Priority Rules, Internalization, and Payment for Order Flow

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(3-4), 217-246 open access
Abstract Internalization happens when orders submitted through the same broker are intentionally matched to each other on-exchange or off-exchange. We study the impact of allowing (modes of) internalization on trading rates, investor welfare, and payment for order flow (PFOF). Internalization affects the choice between limit orders and market orders and the participation of dealers in trading. Greater dealer participation creates a greater scope for PFOF. A crucial determinant is the size of the tick. For small ticks, compared with the absence of internalization, its presence leads to higher trading rates, lower investor welfare, and more PFOF. The opposite holds for wide ticks. (JEL G10)

Jumps and Post-FOMC Announcement Returns in Currency Markets

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(3-4), 247-287
Abstract We investigate intraday return dynamics in currency markets around FOMC announcements. Using comprehensive high-frequency exchange rate data, we reveal that post-FOMC announcement returns are significantly low, cancelling out approximately 65% of positive pre-FOMC announcement drifts. These post-announcement reversals mainly result from uncertainty resolution and are mostly realized between 12 and 24 hours after FOMC announcements. This return behavior is significantly related to the negative jump volatilities driven by FOMC announcements. Our findings suggest that our signed jump volatility measures capture informational shocks and uncertainty resolutions and tend to be high under illiquid market conditions. (JEL G14, G15)

Alpha Go Everywhere: Machine Learning and International Stock Returns

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(3-4), 288-331
Abstract We apply machine learning techniques to predict international stock returns using firm characteristics. Market-specific training is important, as neural network models (NNs) achieve stronger results when they are trained in each market separately than in a global model trained with U.S. data. NNs outperform linear models in predicting stock return rankings and forming profitable portfolios. In contrast, regression trees underperform linear models when the number of observations is low. We also show that adding variables constructed from U.S. firm characteristics, which may contain information beyond the characteristics of international stocks, further enhances the return predictability of market-specific NNs. (JEL C52, G10, G12, G15)

“Superstitious” Investors

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(1), 1-45
Abstract We reconsider the excess volatility puzzle through the lens of a model in which agents believe they can predict dividend growth when in fact they cannot. Besides excess volatility in the time series, the model explains the value premium, and the explanatory power of the value factor. In support of the model, we show that analysts’ earnings forecasts align with market valuation and that analysts are far more optimistic about growth stocks than they are about value stocks. Using both survey and price data, we show that the same mechanism can explain the excess returns earned by investing in high-interest rate currencies. (JEL G12, G15, G41)

The Cross-Section of Stock Returns Around the World in the Early Twentieth Century

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(1), 46-73 open access
Abstract We study nine equity markets between 1900 and 1925 to provide an out-of-sample test of some major asset pricing anomalies during a period in which anomalies had not been documented. We find strong evidence of momentum in almost every market. We find no evidence of long-term reversals, which, coupled with the limited presence of institutional investors, suggests that underreaction should be considered as a key aspect of behavioral theories of momentum. We also find evidence for the size effect, betting-against-beta, and the outperformance of low volatility stocks, whereas we find mixed evidence of short-term reversal. (JEL G12, G15, N20)

Welfare Costs of Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Consumption Shocks

The Review of Asset Pricing Studies 2025 15(2), 103-120
Abstract I estimate the welfare benefits of eliminating idiosyncratic consumption shocks in the United States related (unrelated) to the business cycle as 36%–39% (lower than 1%) of household utility. Estimates of the former exceed earlier ones because I distinguish between idiosyncratic shocks related/unrelated to the business cycle, estimate the negative skewness of shocks, target moments of idiosyncratic shocks from household-level CEX data, and target market moments. Benefits of eliminating aggregate shocks are lower than 1% of utility. Policy should facilitate the insurance of idiosyncratic shocks related to the business cycle, such as job layoffs, with proof that individuals diligently seek suitable employment during periods of unemployment. (JEL D31, D52, E32, E44, G01, G12)