Knowledge that Transforms

How did #MeToo alter collaboration between women and men? I show junior female researchers start fewer projects after #MeToo. A decrease in collaborations with male coauthors—especially new senior male coauthors at the same institution—largely explains the decline. The decrease is larger at universities with higher perceived harassment accusation risk and smaller where both women and men publicly express greater awareness of gender issues. I find no evidence that reduced collaboration improves research outcomes for junior female researchers. The results suggest that #MeToo led to a breakdown in trust that came at a cost for junior women's career opportunities.

Firms increasingly support employee‐led startups by providing funding in exchange for equity. These investments create a dual role for employees, who pursue their entrepreneurial ventures as shared residual claimants while continuing to work on core tasks under incomplete fixed‐pay contracts. Although the investments align incentives within the startup, their effects on employees' effort in their core roles remain unclear. Using an experimental economics approach, I examine how a firm's investment decision affects employees' effort on core tasks. To isolate what is unique about equity investments, I use a non‐equity gift of equal monetary value as the baseline. The results show that employees reduce effort more when the firm denies a non‐equity gift than when it denies an equity investment. This difference arises because employees view a denied equity investment as the firm's business judgment based on risk and expected return, rather than as a failure to act generously. When funding in either form is provided, employees reciprocate positively, resulting in similarly high effort. Overall, the findings suggest that equity‐based entrepreneurship programs can help motivate effort on both startups and core tasks while mitigating the harm of rejecting employees' proposals.

This study examines whether weakening employee non‐disclosure agreements (NDAs) affects the flow of information to capital markets via the business press. After state laws weakened NDAs related to misconduct, treated firms exhibit a significant increase in corporate news relative to control firms. The increase is driven by non‐financial news, particularly about legal issues and corporate social responsibility. Articles become significantly more negative in tone and generate stronger market reactions, indicating that employees increasingly share informative negative information with journalists. Further, we document increased interactions between employees and journalists, with more articles citing employees as sources. Our evidence suggests that employees are an important source of corporate information for journalists and that blanket NDAs can impede this channel. Overall, the study highlights an important trade‐off between protecting firms' confidential information and preserving transparency. Our findings suggest that boards, executives, and regulators should design employment confidentiality policies that protect legitimate proprietary information without suppressing the disclosure of misconduct that is important for market discipline and governance.

The sensitivity of the external finance premium to firms’ net-worth-to-capital ratio is central to the strength of the financial accelerator, yet direct firm-level evidence remains scarce. We estimate this elasticity using balance sheet and income statement data for Swiss nonfinancial firms over 1998–2016. To address the endogeneity of net worth, we employ two complementary instrumental variable strategies: one based on firms’ non-operating income and the other a shift-share design that interacts predetermined exposure to financial income with aggregate dividend returns. Mapping the estimated elasticity into the costly state verification framework as implemented by Bernanke et al. (1999) yields structural monitoring costs of about one quarter of firms’ gross return on capital, with estimates ranging from 0.15 to 0.35 across specifications. Our results provide direct firm-level support for the financial accelerator mechanism and imply monitoring costs of the same order of magnitude as the benchmark calibration of Bernanke et al. (1999).

We examine the spillover effects of local initial public offerings (IPOs) on new business formation. An IPO in a local area is associated with a 1%–4% increase in new business registrations, and this effect is particularly pronounced in counties facing higher economic uncertainty. New business registrations are significantly influenced by the extent of EDGAR downloads related to the IPO firm's public disclosures and the information in the IPO firm's S‐1 disclosure. The findings highlight the role of IPOs in conveying crucial information through signaling of potential success prospects and additional provision of information through disclosures. A field survey of 503 entrepreneurs further supports these conclusions.

Do impact investors seek impact, or merely “impact wash”? We provide systematic evidence on the nonfinancial determinants of impact investing. Impact investors focus on firms aligned with the priorities of the federal government and disproportionately invest in economically disadvantaged regions. While we find high levels of coinvestment between impact and traditional investors, we also show that impact investors influence the strategies of their traditional coinvestors, are more likely to fund firms in nascent industries, and invest countercyclically. Finally, we characterize investment heterogeneity based on a novel classification of impact investment theses, with a focus on climate, environment, and jobs and equity.

This paper studies the unemployment of physical capital—defined as idle units searching to be traded—and its macroeconomic implications. I provide evidence documenting that capital unemployment is large, volatile, and increases during economic downturns. I construct a capital-accumulation model that explains these patterns, with trading frictions in capital markets, which give rise to equilibrium capital unemployment, and financial shocks, which lead to large fluctuations in trading probabilities and capital unemployment. Using the model, I show that trading frictions and capital unemployment matter for aggregate dynamics. First, unemployed capital affects aggregate investment dynamics: Downturns characterized by large increases in unemployed capital are followed by investment slumps, because the economy tends to recover by absorbing existing unemployed capital rather than by producing new capital goods. Second, capital unemployment constitutes a propagation mechanism from financial shocks to economic activity, which shows up at the aggregate level as measured total factor productivity.